GRANDMA HOERNER'S vs SOFT DRY PINEAPPLE RINGS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SOFT DRY PINEAPPLE RINGS wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
GRANDMA HOERNER'S: 3
vs
SOFT DRY PINEAPPLE RINGS: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | GRANDMA HOERNER'S | SOFT DRY PINEAPPLE RINGS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 70 cal | 280 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 2 g | |
| Carbs | 17.2 g | 66 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 1.6 g | 6 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | GRANDMA HOERNER'S | SOFT DRY PINEAPPLE RINGS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 51.6 MG | 2.4 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | GRANDMA HOERNER'S | SOFT DRY PINEAPPLE RINGS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.7 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 8 MG | 20 MG |