GRACE SNACKS vs CAMBRIDGE & THAMES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
GRACE SNACKS wins in 8 out of 14 nutrient categories
GRACE SNACKS: 8
vs
CAMBRIDGE & THAMES: 2
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | GRACE SNACKS | CAMBRIDGE & THAMES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 393 cal | 500 cal | |
| Protein | 3.6 g | 5.9 g | |
| Carbs | 85.7 g | 67.7 g | |
| Fat | 3.6 g | 23.5 g | |
| Fiber | 3.6 g | 1.5 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | GRACE SNACKS | CAMBRIDGE & THAMES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Niacin | 2.9 MG | 0 MG | |
| Riboflavin | 0.2 MG | 0 MG | |
| Thiamin | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | GRACE SNACKS | CAMBRIDGE & THAMES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 2.6 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 536 MG | 221 MG | |
| Zinc, Zn | 3.2 MG | 0 MG |