GORDON'S CHESAPEAKE CLASSICS vs NANG FAH (TUE KUNG)
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
GORDON'S CHESAPEAKE CLASSICS wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
GORDON'S CHESAPEAKE CLASSICS: 6
vs
NANG FAH (TUE KUNG): 1
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | GORDON'S CHESAPEAKE CLASSICS | NANG FAH (TUE KUNG) | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 50 cal | 260 cal | |
| Protein | 10 g | 6.7 g | |
| Carbs | 1.7 g | 13.3 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 20 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | GORDON'S CHESAPEAKE CLASSICS | NANG FAH (TUE KUNG) | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 12 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | GORDON'S CHESAPEAKE CLASSICS | NANG FAH (TUE KUNG) | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 1.8 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 483 MG | 260 MG |