GOOD LIVIN' vs TSAMMA
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
TSAMMA wins in 9 out of 13 nutrient categories
GOOD LIVIN': 2
vs
TSAMMA: 9
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | GOOD LIVIN' | TSAMMA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 67 cal | 33 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.8 g | |
| Carbs | 16.7 g | 8.3 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.4 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | GOOD LIVIN' | TSAMMA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin B-6 | 0 MG | 0.0 MG | |
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 32.5 MG | 11.2 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | GOOD LIVIN' | TSAMMA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 8 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.4 MG | |
| Magnesium, Mg | 0 MG | 12 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 96 MG | 167 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 15 MG | 0 MG |