GOLDEN TASTE COLE SLAW vs MCCORMICK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
GOLDEN TASTE COLE SLAW wins in 7 out of 11 nutrient categories
GOLDEN TASTE COLE SLAW: 7
vs
MCCORMICK: 2
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | GOLDEN TASTE COLE SLAW | MCCORMICK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 176 cal | 333 cal | |
| Protein | 1.2 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 14.1 g | 66.7 g | |
| Fat | 14.1 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 1.2 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | GOLDEN TASTE COLE SLAW | MCCORMICK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | GOLDEN TASTE COLE SLAW | MCCORMICK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 24 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.4 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 106 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 224 MG | 8,333 MG |