GO NUTS FOR NO NUTS KITCHEN SINK BROWNIE TUB vs CINNAMON APPLE DOUGHNUT HOLES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
GO NUTS FOR NO NUTS KITCHEN SINK BROWNIE TUB wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
GO NUTS FOR NO NUTS KITCHEN SINK BROWNIE TUB: 6
vs
CINNAMON APPLE DOUGHNUT HOLES: 3
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | GO NUTS FOR NO NUTS KITCHEN SINK BROWNIE TUB | CINNAMON APPLE DOUGHNUT HOLES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 424 cal | 450 cal | |
| Protein | 2.4 g | 2.0 g | |
| Carbs | 58.8 g | 53.2 g | |
| Fat | 18.8 g | 26.6 g | |
| Fiber | 2.4 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | GO NUTS FOR NO NUTS KITCHEN SINK BROWNIE TUB | CINNAMON APPLE DOUGHNUT HOLES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | GO NUTS FOR NO NUTS KITCHEN SINK BROWNIE TUB | CINNAMON APPLE DOUGHNUT HOLES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 118 MG | 123 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.4 MG | 1.4 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 400 MG | 61 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 635 MG | 276 MG |