GIANT vs ORIGINAL FUDGE COVERED GRAHAM COOKIES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
GIANT wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
GIANT: 4
vs
ORIGINAL FUDGE COVERED GRAHAM COOKIES: 2
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | GIANT | ORIGINAL FUDGE COVERED GRAHAM COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 464 cal | 500 cal | |
| Protein | 3.6 g | 3.6 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 64.3 g | 67.9 g | |
| Fat | 25 g | 21.4 g | |
| Fiber | 3.6 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | GIANT | ORIGINAL FUDGE COVERED GRAHAM COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | GIANT | ORIGINAL FUDGE COVERED GRAHAM COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 3.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 304 MG | 286 MG |