GIANT CURLY CANE vs CHOCOLATE-ON-CHOCOLATE FILLED MARSHMALLOWS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHOCOLATE-ON-CHOCOLATE FILLED MARSHMALLOWS wins in 7 out of 11 nutrient categories
GIANT CURLY CANE: 2
vs
CHOCOLATE-ON-CHOCOLATE FILLED MARSHMALLOWS: 7
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | GIANT CURLY CANE | CHOCOLATE-ON-CHOCOLATE FILLED MARSHMALLOWS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 368 cal | 378 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 5.4 g | |
| Carbs | 94.7 g | 64.9 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 13.5 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.7 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | GIANT CURLY CANE | CHOCOLATE-ON-CHOCOLATE FILLED MARSHMALLOWS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | GIANT CURLY CANE | CHOCOLATE-ON-CHOCOLATE FILLED MARSHMALLOWS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 54 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 2.4 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 243 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 68 MG |