GENERAL TAO A SWEET & SPICY BLEND OF RICE VINEGAR vs DIETZ & WATSON
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
GENERAL TAO A SWEET & SPICY BLEND OF RICE VINEGAR wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
GENERAL TAO A SWEET & SPICY BLEND OF RICE VINEGAR: 3
vs
DIETZ & WATSON: 1
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | GENERAL TAO A SWEET & SPICY BLEND OF RICE VINEGAR | DIETZ & WATSON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 31 cal | 400 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 7.1 g | 20 g | |
| Fat | 1.3 g | 30 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | GENERAL TAO A SWEET & SPICY BLEND OF RICE VINEGAR | DIETZ & WATSON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | GENERAL TAO A SWEET & SPICY BLEND OF RICE VINEGAR | DIETZ & WATSON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 416 MG | 600 MG |