GARLAND JACK'S vs MCCORMICK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MCCORMICK wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
GARLAND JACK'S: 0
vs
MCCORMICK: 3
(7 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | GARLAND JACK'S | MCCORMICK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 189 cal | 139 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 43.2 g | 27.8 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | GARLAND JACK'S | MCCORMICK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | GARLAND JACK'S | MCCORMICK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 946 MG | 2,000 MG |