GARDEN VEGETABLE RANCH REDUCED-FAT POTATO CHIPS vs H.K ANDERSON
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie, both foods score equally across 11 nutrient categories
GARDEN VEGETABLE RANCH REDUCED-FAT POTATO CHIPS: 5
vs
H.K ANDERSON: 5
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | GARDEN VEGETABLE RANCH REDUCED-FAT POTATO CHIPS | H.K ANDERSON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 464 cal | 500 cal | |
| Protein | 7.1 g | 16.7 g | |
| Carbs | 64.3 g | 50 g | |
| Fat | 21.4 g | 23.3 g | |
| Fiber | 7.1 g | 6.7 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | GARDEN VEGETABLE RANCH REDUCED-FAT POTATO CHIPS | H.K ANDERSON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 12.9 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | GARDEN VEGETABLE RANCH REDUCED-FAT POTATO CHIPS | H.K ANDERSON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 71 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 2.4 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 367 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 679 MG | 1,100 MG |