FULLY COOKED PORK BABY BACK RIBS vs CHICKEN MARSALA PALEO
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHICKEN MARSALA PALEO wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
FULLY COOKED PORK BABY BACK RIBS: 3
vs
CHICKEN MARSALA PALEO: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | FULLY COOKED PORK BABY BACK RIBS | CHICKEN MARSALA PALEO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 229 cal | 121 cal | |
| Protein | 14.3 g | 17.1 g | |
| Carbs | 10.7 g | 2.9 g | |
| Fat | 11.4 g | 3.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | FULLY COOKED PORK BABY BACK RIBS | CHICKEN MARSALA PALEO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | FULLY COOKED PORK BABY BACK RIBS | CHICKEN MARSALA PALEO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 29 MG | 7 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 389 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 429 MG | 321 MG |