FULLY COOKED HOT LINKS vs PAINTED HILLS NATURAL BEEF
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
FULLY COOKED HOT LINKS wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
FULLY COOKED HOT LINKS: 6
vs
PAINTED HILLS NATURAL BEEF: 2
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | FULLY COOKED HOT LINKS | PAINTED HILLS NATURAL BEEF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 266 cal | 280 cal | |
| Protein | 19.0 g | 16 g | |
| Carbs | 3.8 g | 2.7 g | |
| Fat | 19.0 g | 22.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | FULLY COOKED HOT LINKS | PAINTED HILLS NATURAL BEEF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 30.4 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | FULLY COOKED HOT LINKS | PAINTED HILLS NATURAL BEEF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 25 MG | 27 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.1 MG | 1.9 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,215 MG | 893 MG |