FULLY COOKED HOT LINKS vs NATURAL AMERICAN ANGUS UNCURED BEEF FRANKS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
FULLY COOKED HOT LINKS wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
FULLY COOKED HOT LINKS: 5
vs
NATURAL AMERICAN ANGUS UNCURED BEEF FRANKS: 4
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | FULLY COOKED HOT LINKS | NATURAL AMERICAN ANGUS UNCURED BEEF FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 266 cal | 255 cal | |
| Protein | 19.0 g | 12.8 g | |
| Carbs | 3.8 g | 2.1 g | |
| Fat | 19.0 g | 23.4 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | FULLY COOKED HOT LINKS | NATURAL AMERICAN ANGUS UNCURED BEEF FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 30.4 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | FULLY COOKED HOT LINKS | NATURAL AMERICAN ANGUS UNCURED BEEF FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 25 MG | 13 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.1 MG | 2.1 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 28 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,215 MG | 830 MG |