FULLY COOKED CHICKEN PATTIES vs ANGUS SIRLOIN STEAK BURGER
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ANGUS SIRLOIN STEAK BURGER wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
FULLY COOKED CHICKEN PATTIES: 3
vs
ANGUS SIRLOIN STEAK BURGER: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | FULLY COOKED CHICKEN PATTIES | ANGUS SIRLOIN STEAK BURGER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 259 cal | 252 cal | |
| Protein | 10.6 g | 17.2 g | |
| Carbs | 14.1 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 17.7 g | 19.9 g | |
| Fiber | 1.2 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | FULLY COOKED CHICKEN PATTIES | ANGUS SIRLOIN STEAK BURGER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | FULLY COOKED CHICKEN PATTIES | ANGUS SIRLOIN STEAK BURGER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 13 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.7 MG | 1.8 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 682 MG | 192 MG |