FULLY COOKED BUN LENGTH HOT DOGS MADE WITH CHICKEN & PORK vs ANGUS BEEF FRANKS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ANGUS BEEF FRANKS wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
FULLY COOKED BUN LENGTH HOT DOGS MADE WITH CHICKEN & PORK: 1
vs
ANGUS BEEF FRANKS: 5
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | FULLY COOKED BUN LENGTH HOT DOGS MADE WITH CHICKEN & PORK | ANGUS BEEF FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 298 cal | 240 cal | |
| Protein | 7.0 g | 12 g | |
| Carbs | 5.3 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 28.1 g | 22 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | FULLY COOKED BUN LENGTH HOT DOGS MADE WITH CHICKEN & PORK | ANGUS BEEF FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | FULLY COOKED BUN LENGTH HOT DOGS MADE WITH CHICKEN & PORK | ANGUS BEEF FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 2.2 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,158 MG | 900 MG |