FULLY-COOKED BEEF BURGERS vs SLOW-ROASTED PORK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SLOW-ROASTED PORK wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
FULLY-COOKED BEEF BURGERS: 3
vs
SLOW-ROASTED PORK: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | FULLY-COOKED BEEF BURGERS | SLOW-ROASTED PORK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 293 cal | 157 cal | |
| Protein | 15.2 g | 13.6 g | |
| Carbs | 1.0 g | 11.4 g | |
| Fat | 25.3 g | 6.4 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | FULLY-COOKED BEEF BURGERS | SLOW-ROASTED PORK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 2.6 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | FULLY-COOKED BEEF BURGERS | SLOW-ROASTED PORK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 14 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.7 MG | 0.8 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 404 MG | 457 MG |