FUDGE MARSHMALLOW WHIRLS COOKIES vs CHOCOLATE CHUNK COOKIES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
FUDGE MARSHMALLOW WHIRLS COOKIES wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
FUDGE MARSHMALLOW WHIRLS COOKIES: 5
vs
CHOCOLATE CHUNK COOKIES: 4
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | FUDGE MARSHMALLOW WHIRLS COOKIES | CHOCOLATE CHUNK COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 448 cal | 500 cal | |
| Protein | 3.5 g | 3.1 g | |
| Carbs | 69.0 g | 62.5 g | |
| Fat | 17.2 g | 28.1 g | |
| Fiber | 3.4 g | 3.1 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | FUDGE MARSHMALLOW WHIRLS COOKIES | CHOCOLATE CHUNK COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | FUDGE MARSHMALLOW WHIRLS COOKIES | CHOCOLATE CHUNK COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 62 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 3.5 MG | 2.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 125 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 172 MG | 344 MG |