FUDGE MARSHMALLOW WHIRLS COOKIES vs BAKERY STREET
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BAKERY STREET wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
FUDGE MARSHMALLOW WHIRLS COOKIES: 3
vs
BAKERY STREET: 4
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | FUDGE MARSHMALLOW WHIRLS COOKIES | BAKERY STREET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 448 cal | 250 cal | |
| Protein | 3.5 g | 7.1 g | |
| Carbs | 69.0 g | 46.4 g | |
| Fat | 17.2 g | 3.6 g | |
| Fiber | 3.4 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | FUDGE MARSHMALLOW WHIRLS COOKIES | BAKERY STREET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | FUDGE MARSHMALLOW WHIRLS COOKIES | BAKERY STREET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 3.5 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 172 MG | 0 MG |