FUDGE MARSHMALLOW RING COOKIES vs WEGMANS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WEGMANS wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
FUDGE MARSHMALLOW RING COOKIES: 3
vs
WEGMANS: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | FUDGE MARSHMALLOW RING COOKIES | WEGMANS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 448 cal | 494 cal | |
| Protein | 3.5 g | 4.7 g | |
| Carbs | 69.0 g | 57.7 g | |
| Fat | 17.2 g | 27.1 g | |
| Fiber | 3.4 g | 2.4 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | FUDGE MARSHMALLOW RING COOKIES | WEGMANS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | FUDGE MARSHMALLOW RING COOKIES | WEGMANS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 24 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 3.1 MG | 3.2 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 172 MG | 412 MG |