FUDGE MARSHMALLOW RING COOKIES vs WEGMANS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WEGMANS wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
FUDGE MARSHMALLOW RING COOKIES: 4
vs
WEGMANS: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | FUDGE MARSHMALLOW RING COOKIES | WEGMANS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 448 cal | 462 cal | |
| Protein | 3.5 g | 3.9 g | |
| Carbs | 69.0 g | 65.4 g | |
| Fat | 17.2 g | 19.2 g | |
| Fiber | 3.4 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | FUDGE MARSHMALLOW RING COOKIES | WEGMANS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | FUDGE MARSHMALLOW RING COOKIES | WEGMANS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 77 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 3.1 MG | 1.4 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 154 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 172 MG | 327 MG |