FUDGE MARSHMALLOW COOKIES vs OATMEAL RAISIN COOKIES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
OATMEAL RAISIN COOKIES wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
FUDGE MARSHMALLOW COOKIES: 1
vs
OATMEAL RAISIN COOKIES: 6
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | FUDGE MARSHMALLOW COOKIES | OATMEAL RAISIN COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 448 cal | 360 cal | |
| Protein | 3.5 g | 4 g | |
| Carbs | 69.0 g | 68 g | |
| Fat | 17.2 g | 12 g | |
| Fiber | 3.4 g | 4 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | FUDGE MARSHMALLOW COOKIES | OATMEAL RAISIN COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | FUDGE MARSHMALLOW COOKIES | OATMEAL RAISIN COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 3.1 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 172 MG | 320 MG |