FUDGE MARSHMALLOW CHOCOLATE COOKIES vs OATMEAL ANIMAL COOKIES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
OATMEAL ANIMAL COOKIES wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
FUDGE MARSHMALLOW CHOCOLATE COOKIES: 3
vs
OATMEAL ANIMAL COOKIES: 4
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | FUDGE MARSHMALLOW CHOCOLATE COOKIES | OATMEAL ANIMAL COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 429 cal | 455 cal | |
| Protein | 3.6 g | 9.1 g | |
| Carbs | 67.9 g | 72.7 g | |
| Fat | 17.9 g | 15.9 g | |
| Fiber | 3.6 g | 4.5 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | FUDGE MARSHMALLOW CHOCOLATE COOKIES | OATMEAL ANIMAL COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | FUDGE MARSHMALLOW CHOCOLATE COOKIES | OATMEAL ANIMAL COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 2.9 MG | 1.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 179 MG | 432 MG |