FUDGE COVERED SANDWICH COOKIES vs LUNDS & BYERLYS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LUNDS & BYERLYS wins in 7 out of 11 nutrient categories
FUDGE COVERED SANDWICH COOKIES: 2
vs
LUNDS & BYERLYS: 7
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | FUDGE COVERED SANDWICH COOKIES | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 526 cal | 429 cal | |
| Protein | 5.3 g | 5.4 g | |
| Carbs | 68.4 g | 62.5 g | |
| Fat | 26.3 g | 16.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 1.8 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | FUDGE COVERED SANDWICH COOKIES | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | FUDGE COVERED SANDWICH COOKIES | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 53 MG | 71 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.6 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 158 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 158 MG | 321 MG |