FRUIT SQUEEZE vs SOFT DRY PINEAPPLE RINGS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SOFT DRY PINEAPPLE RINGS wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
FRUIT SQUEEZE: 2
vs
SOFT DRY PINEAPPLE RINGS: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | FRUIT SQUEEZE | SOFT DRY PINEAPPLE RINGS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 56 cal | 280 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 2 g | |
| Carbs | 14.4 g | 66 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 1.1 g | 6 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | FRUIT SQUEEZE | SOFT DRY PINEAPPLE RINGS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 1.3 MG | 2.4 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | FRUIT SQUEEZE | SOFT DRY PINEAPPLE RINGS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0.4 MG | 0.7 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 11 MG | 20 MG |