FRUIT SLICES vs SOUR WATERMELON FLAVORED MARSHMALLOW CHICKS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SOUR WATERMELON FLAVORED MARSHMALLOW CHICKS wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
FRUIT SLICES: 0
vs
SOUR WATERMELON FLAVORED MARSHMALLOW CHICKS: 5
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | FRUIT SLICES | SOUR WATERMELON FLAVORED MARSHMALLOW CHICKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 348 cal | 294 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 2.9 g | |
| Carbs | 89.1 g | 76.5 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | FRUIT SLICES | SOUR WATERMELON FLAVORED MARSHMALLOW CHICKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | FRUIT SLICES | SOUR WATERMELON FLAVORED MARSHMALLOW CHICKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 3 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 9 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |