FRUIT PUNCH FLAVORED LOWER SUGAR THIRST QUENCHER vs ORAL ELECTROLYTE SOLUTION WITH ZINC
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ORAL ELECTROLYTE SOLUTION WITH ZINC wins in 3 out of 9 nutrient categories
FRUIT PUNCH FLAVORED LOWER SUGAR THIRST QUENCHER: 2
vs
ORAL ELECTROLYTE SOLUTION WITH ZINC: 3
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | FRUIT PUNCH FLAVORED LOWER SUGAR THIRST QUENCHER | ORAL ELECTROLYTE SOLUTION WITH ZINC | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 8 cal | 11 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 2.2 g | 2.5 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | FRUIT PUNCH FLAVORED LOWER SUGAR THIRST QUENCHER | ORAL ELECTROLYTE SOLUTION WITH ZINC | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Potassium, K | 12 MG | 76 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 46 MG | 101 MG | |
| Zinc, Zn | 0 MG | 0.8 MG |