FROSTED SUGAR COOKIES vs LUNDS & BYERLYS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LUNDS & BYERLYS wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
FROSTED SUGAR COOKIES: 3
vs
LUNDS & BYERLYS: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | FROSTED SUGAR COOKIES | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 421 cal | 429 cal | |
| Protein | 2.6 g | 5.4 g | |
| Carbs | 65.8 g | 62.5 g | |
| Fat | 15.8 g | 16.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 1.8 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | FROSTED SUGAR COOKIES | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | FROSTED SUGAR COOKIES | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 71 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.9 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 263 MG | 321 MG |