FRIED PORK RINDS vs FATBACK PORK WITH SKIN ATTACHED HOT
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
FRIED PORK RINDS wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
FRIED PORK RINDS: 3
vs
FATBACK PORK WITH SKIN ATTACHED HOT: 1
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | FRIED PORK RINDS | FATBACK PORK WITH SKIN ATTACHED HOT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 571 cal | 643 cal | |
| Protein | 50 g | 42.9 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 35.7 g | 50 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | FRIED PORK RINDS | FATBACK PORK WITH SKIN ATTACHED HOT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | FRIED PORK RINDS | FATBACK PORK WITH SKIN ATTACHED HOT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 1,429 MG | 3,143 MG |