FRENCH LAMB RACKS 16-18 vs FRANK ALL BEEF
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
FRENCH LAMB RACKS 16-18 wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
FRENCH LAMB RACKS 16-18: 5
vs
FRANK ALL BEEF: 3
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | FRENCH LAMB RACKS 16-18 | FRANK ALL BEEF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 152 cal | 319 cal | |
| Protein | 20.5 g | 11.1 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 5.6 g | |
| Fat | 7.1 g | 29.2 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | FRENCH LAMB RACKS 16-18 | FRANK ALL BEEF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | FRENCH LAMB RACKS 16-18 | FRANK ALL BEEF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 8 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.4 MG | 1.5 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 330 MG | 514 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 62 MG | 917 MG |