FRANKFORD vs FAST ACTING GLUCOSE ASSORTED FRUIT
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
FAST ACTING GLUCOSE ASSORTED FRUIT wins in 2 out of 8 nutrient categories
FRANKFORD: 1
vs
FAST ACTING GLUCOSE ASSORTED FRUIT: 2
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | FRANKFORD | FAST ACTING GLUCOSE ASSORTED FRUIT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 357 cal | 444 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 89.3 g | 88.9 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | FRANKFORD | FAST ACTING GLUCOSE ASSORTED FRUIT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 133.3 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | FRANKFORD | FAST ACTING GLUCOSE ASSORTED FRUIT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |