FRANKFORD vs ROASTED CALIFORNIA ALMONDS COVERED IN MILK CHOCOLATE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ROASTED CALIFORNIA ALMONDS COVERED IN MILK CHOCOLATE wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
FRANKFORD: 3
vs
ROASTED CALIFORNIA ALMONDS COVERED IN MILK CHOCOLATE: 6
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | FRANKFORD | ROASTED CALIFORNIA ALMONDS COVERED IN MILK CHOCOLATE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 485 cal | 514 cal | |
| Protein | 3.0 g | 8.1 g | |
| Carbs | 66.7 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 24.2 g | 29.7 g | |
| Fiber | 3 g | 2.7 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | FRANKFORD | ROASTED CALIFORNIA ALMONDS COVERED IN MILK CHOCOLATE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | FRANKFORD | ROASTED CALIFORNIA ALMONDS COVERED IN MILK CHOCOLATE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 121 MG | 162 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.1 MG | 3.9 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 378 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 61 MG | 68 MG |