FRANKFORD vs MARSHMALLOW HEARTS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
FRANKFORD wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
FRANKFORD: 6
vs
MARSHMALLOW HEARTS: 2
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | FRANKFORD | MARSHMALLOW HEARTS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 500 cal | 345 cal | |
| Protein | 4.8 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 69.1 g | 86.2 g | |
| Fat | 23.8 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 2.4 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | FRANKFORD | MARSHMALLOW HEARTS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | FRANKFORD | MARSHMALLOW HEARTS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 95 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.7 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 71 MG | 34 MG |