FRANKFORD vs COTTONDALE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
FRANKFORD wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
FRANKFORD: 4
vs
COTTONDALE: 3
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | FRANKFORD | COTTONDALE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 543 cal | 536 cal | |
| Protein | 5.7 g | 3.6 g | |
| Carbs | 65.7 g | 67.9 g | |
| Fat | 28.6 g | 28.6 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 2.9 g | 3.6 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | FRANKFORD | COTTONDALE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | FRANKFORD | COTTONDALE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 114 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.1 MG | 2.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 57 MG | 54 MG |