FRANKFORD vs SOFT GUMMY ROPE COVERED WITH TINY TANGY CRUNCHY CANDY
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SOFT GUMMY ROPE COVERED WITH TINY TANGY CRUNCHY CANDY wins in 3 out of 7 nutrient categories
FRANKFORD: 0
vs
SOFT GUMMY ROPE COVERED WITH TINY TANGY CRUNCHY CANDY: 3
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | FRANKFORD | SOFT GUMMY ROPE COVERED WITH TINY TANGY CRUNCHY CANDY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 417 cal | 346 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 100 g | 84.6 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | FRANKFORD | SOFT GUMMY ROPE COVERED WITH TINY TANGY CRUNCHY CANDY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 19 MG |