FRANKFORD vs FAST ACTING GLUCOSE GEL
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
FAST ACTING GLUCOSE GEL wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
FRANKFORD: 0
vs
FAST ACTING GLUCOSE GEL: 3
(7 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | FRANKFORD | FAST ACTING GLUCOSE GEL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 357 cal | 184 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 89.3 g | 44.7 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | FRANKFORD | FAST ACTING GLUCOSE GEL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | FRANKFORD | FAST ACTING GLUCOSE GEL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 26 MG |