FOOT LONG SKINLESS FRANKFURTERS vs BISON AND BEEF HOT DOGS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BISON AND BEEF HOT DOGS wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
FOOT LONG SKINLESS FRANKFURTERS: 2
vs
BISON AND BEEF HOT DOGS: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | FOOT LONG SKINLESS FRANKFURTERS | BISON AND BEEF HOT DOGS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 303 cal | 250 cal | |
| Protein | 10.5 g | 15.8 g | |
| Carbs | 2.6 g | 1.3 g | |
| Fat | 27.6 g | 21.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | FOOT LONG SKINLESS FRANKFURTERS | BISON AND BEEF HOT DOGS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | FOOT LONG SKINLESS FRANKFURTERS | BISON AND BEEF HOT DOGS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 53 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.0 MG | 1.2 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,000 MG | 605 MG |