FOOD SHOULD TASTE GOOD vs QUEEN OF KALE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
QUEEN OF KALE wins in 8 out of 11 nutrient categories
FOOD SHOULD TASTE GOOD: 1
vs
QUEEN OF KALE: 8
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | FOOD SHOULD TASTE GOOD | QUEEN OF KALE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 500 cal | 424 cal | |
| Protein | 7.1 g | 10.6 g | |
| Carbs | 64.3 g | 49.5 g | |
| Fat | 21.4 g | 21.2 g | |
| Fiber | 7.1 g | 7.1 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | FOOD SHOULD TASTE GOOD | QUEEN OF KALE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 190.8 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | FOOD SHOULD TASTE GOOD | QUEEN OF KALE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 71 MG | 283 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 5.1 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 232 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 429 MG | 442 MG |