FOOD SHOULD TASTE GOOD vs CHEDDAR BAKED SNACK CRACKERS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHEDDAR BAKED SNACK CRACKERS wins in 7 out of 14 nutrient categories
FOOD SHOULD TASTE GOOD: 4
vs
CHEDDAR BAKED SNACK CRACKERS: 7
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | FOOD SHOULD TASTE GOOD | CHEDDAR BAKED SNACK CRACKERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 464 cal | 467 cal | |
| Protein | 10.7 g | 10 g | |
| Carbs | 67.9 g | 66.7 g | |
| Fat | 16.1 g | 16.7 g | |
| Fiber | 3.6 g | 3.3 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | FOOD SHOULD TASTE GOOD | CHEDDAR BAKED SNACK CRACKERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Niacin | 0 MG | 7.7 MG | |
| Riboflavin | 0 MG | 0.7 MG | |
| Thiamin | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | FOOD SHOULD TASTE GOOD | CHEDDAR BAKED SNACK CRACKERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 71 MG | 100 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 4 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 71 MG | 167 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 304 MG | 733 MG |