FISHLESS TUNA vs PETITE SIRLOIN STEAK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
FISHLESS TUNA wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
FISHLESS TUNA: 5
vs
PETITE SIRLOIN STEAK: 2
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | FISHLESS TUNA | PETITE SIRLOIN STEAK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 140 cal | 179 cal | |
| Protein | 16.3 g | 17.9 g | |
| Carbs | 11.6 g | 1.2 g | |
| Fat | 2.3 g | 10.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | FISHLESS TUNA | PETITE SIRLOIN STEAK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | FISHLESS TUNA | PETITE SIRLOIN STEAK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 93 MG | 24 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 3.4 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 326 MG | 262 MG |