FIRE-ROASTED TOMATO SEASONED DRY RUB BONELESS PORK RIBEYE CHOPS vs ANGUS BEEF 80% LEAN - 20% FAT GROUND CHUCK CLASSIC BISTRO PATTIES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
FIRE-ROASTED TOMATO SEASONED DRY RUB BONELESS PORK RIBEYE CHOPS wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
FIRE-ROASTED TOMATO SEASONED DRY RUB BONELESS PORK RIBEYE CHOPS: 5
vs
ANGUS BEEF 80% LEAN - 20% FAT GROUND CHUCK CLASSIC BISTRO PATTIES: 3
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | FIRE-ROASTED TOMATO SEASONED DRY RUB BONELESS PORK RIBEYE CHOPS | ANGUS BEEF 80% LEAN - 20% FAT GROUND CHUCK CLASSIC BISTRO PATTIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 161 cal | 253 cal | |
| Protein | 19.6 g | 17.2 g | |
| Carbs | 2.7 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 8.0 g | 20.2 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | FIRE-ROASTED TOMATO SEASONED DRY RUB BONELESS PORK RIBEYE CHOPS | ANGUS BEEF 80% LEAN - 20% FAT GROUND CHUCK CLASSIC BISTRO PATTIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 1.1 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | FIRE-ROASTED TOMATO SEASONED DRY RUB BONELESS PORK RIBEYE CHOPS | ANGUS BEEF 80% LEAN - 20% FAT GROUND CHUCK CLASSIC BISTRO PATTIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 18 MG | 20 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.0 MG | 1.9 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 304 MG | 66 MG |