FINGER LAKES WINE PORK vs BEEF SKINLESS SMOKED SAUSAGE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BEEF SKINLESS SMOKED SAUSAGE wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
FINGER LAKES WINE PORK: 3
vs
BEEF SKINLESS SMOKED SAUSAGE: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | FINGER LAKES WINE PORK | BEEF SKINLESS SMOKED SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 289 cal | 321 cal | |
| Protein | 10.5 g | 10.7 g | |
| Carbs | 1.3 g | 7.1 g | |
| Fat | 26.3 g | 28.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | FINGER LAKES WINE PORK | BEEF SKINLESS SMOKED SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 16.1 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | FINGER LAKES WINE PORK | BEEF SKINLESS SMOKED SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 1.0 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 737 MG | 911 MG |