FIG & ROSEMARY ARTISANAL CRISPS vs SUGAR ROLLED STYLE CONES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
FIG & ROSEMARY ARTISANAL CRISPS wins in 7 out of 11 nutrient categories
FIG & ROSEMARY ARTISANAL CRISPS: 7
vs
SUGAR ROLLED STYLE CONES: 2
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | FIG & ROSEMARY ARTISANAL CRISPS | SUGAR ROLLED STYLE CONES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 389 cal | 409 cal | |
| Protein | 11.1 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 66.7 g | 90.9 g | |
| Fat | 8.3 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 9.1 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | FIG & ROSEMARY ARTISANAL CRISPS | SUGAR ROLLED STYLE CONES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | FIG & ROSEMARY ARTISANAL CRISPS | SUGAR ROLLED STYLE CONES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 111 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 5.6 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 167 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,056 MG | 136 MG |