EVAPORATED SKIM MILK vs CULTURED LOWFAT BUTTERMILK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CULTURED LOWFAT BUTTERMILK wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
EVAPORATED SKIM MILK: 3
vs
CULTURED LOWFAT BUTTERMILK: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | EVAPORATED SKIM MILK | CULTURED LOWFAT BUTTERMILK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 83 cal | 50 cal | |
| Protein | 6.7 g | 3.8 g | |
| Carbs | 10 g | 5.8 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 1.0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | EVAPORATED SKIM MILK | CULTURED LOWFAT BUTTERMILK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0.5 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | EVAPORATED SKIM MILK | CULTURED LOWFAT BUTTERMILK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 267 MG | 146 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 117 MG | 146 MG |