EVAPORATED FILLED MILK vs 1.5% CULTURED REDUCED FAT BUTTERMILK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
1.5% CULTURED REDUCED FAT BUTTERMILK wins in 5 out of 13 nutrient categories
EVAPORATED FILLED MILK: 4
vs
1.5% CULTURED REDUCED FAT BUTTERMILK: 5
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | EVAPORATED FILLED MILK | 1.5% CULTURED REDUCED FAT BUTTERMILK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 133 cal | 50 cal | |
| Protein | 6.7 g | 3.8 g | |
| Carbs | 10 g | 5.8 g | |
| Fat | 6.7 g | 1.5 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | EVAPORATED FILLED MILK | 1.5% CULTURED REDUCED FAT BUTTERMILK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Riboflavin | 0.2 MG | 0 MG | |
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 1 UG |
Minerals
| Mineral | EVAPORATED FILLED MILK | 1.5% CULTURED REDUCED FAT BUTTERMILK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 267 MG | 142 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 350 MG | 183 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 100 MG | 121 MG |