EMERALD vs CHOCOLATE COVERED PRETZELS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
EMERALD wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
EMERALD: 5
vs
CHOCOLATE COVERED PRETZELS: 3
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | EMERALD | CHOCOLATE COVERED PRETZELS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 571 cal | 450 cal | |
| Protein | 17.1 g | 7.5 g | |
| Carbs | 28.6 g | 72.5 g | |
| Fat | 45.7 g | 17.5 g | |
| Fiber | 5.7 g | 2.5 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | EMERALD | CHOCOLATE COVERED PRETZELS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | EMERALD | CHOCOLATE COVERED PRETZELS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 100 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 6.2 MG | 0.9 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 543 MG | 312 MG |