EL COMAL vs ORIGINAL KETTLE COOKED POTATO CHIPS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ORIGINAL KETTLE COOKED POTATO CHIPS wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
EL COMAL: 2
vs
ORIGINAL KETTLE COOKED POTATO CHIPS: 6
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | EL COMAL | ORIGINAL KETTLE COOKED POTATO CHIPS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 464 cal | 464 cal | Tie |
| Protein | 7.1 g | 7.1 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 32.1 g | 71.4 g | |
| Fat | 35.7 g | 17.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 7.1 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | EL COMAL | ORIGINAL KETTLE COOKED POTATO CHIPS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 17.1 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | EL COMAL | ORIGINAL KETTLE COOKED POTATO CHIPS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 71 MG | 36 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 2.5 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 1,607 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 339 MG | 482 MG |