EGGS TRASPECIAL SANDED GUMMIES vs CHICK N' EGG MARSHMALLOW
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
EGGS TRASPECIAL SANDED GUMMIES wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
EGGS TRASPECIAL SANDED GUMMIES: 5
vs
CHICK N' EGG MARSHMALLOW: 2
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | EGGS TRASPECIAL SANDED GUMMIES | CHICK N' EGG MARSHMALLOW | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 305 cal | 389 cal | |
| Protein | 5 g | 3.5 g | |
| Carbs | 72.5 g | 74.2 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 10.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.5 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | EGGS TRASPECIAL SANDED GUMMIES | CHICK N' EGG MARSHMALLOW | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | EGGS TRASPECIAL SANDED GUMMIES | CHICK N' EGG MARSHMALLOW | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 4.1 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 55 MG | 71 MG |