ECHO FALLS vs TRAPPER'S CREEK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
TRAPPER'S CREEK wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
ECHO FALLS: 0
vs
TRAPPER'S CREEK: 4
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ECHO FALLS | TRAPPER'S CREEK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 175 cal | 158 cal | |
| Protein | 22.8 g | 24.6 g | |
| Carbs | 1.8 g | 1.8 g | Tie |
| Fat | 7.9 g | 6.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ECHO FALLS | TRAPPER'S CREEK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | ECHO FALLS | TRAPPER'S CREEK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,000 MG | 1,000 MG | Tie |