ECHO FALLS vs SLOW-ROASTED ORIGINAL SALMON
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 10 nutrient categories
ECHO FALLS: 3
vs
SLOW-ROASTED ORIGINAL SALMON: 3
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ECHO FALLS | SLOW-ROASTED ORIGINAL SALMON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 179 cal | 140 cal | |
| Protein | 19.6 g | 26.3 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 3.5 g | |
| Fat | 10.7 g | 2.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ECHO FALLS | SLOW-ROASTED ORIGINAL SALMON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 4.3 MG | 2.1 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | ECHO FALLS | SLOW-ROASTED ORIGINAL SALMON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 1,107 MG | 912 MG |